Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40053772›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025

Asynchronous Distance Learning Performance and Knowledge Retention of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Among Health Care Professionals Using Video or e-Learning: Web-based Randomized Controlled Trial.

Avinash Koka, Loric Stuby, Emmanuel Carrera, Ahmed Gabr, Margaret O'Connor, Nathalie Missilier Peruzzo, Olivier Waeterloot, Friedrich Medlin, Fabien Rigolet, Thomas Schmutz and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Avinash KokaDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3911-0528
Loric StubyGenève TEAM Ambulances, Emergency Medical Services, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1663-5249
Emmanuel CarreraStroke Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0045-5382
Ahmed GabrDepartment of Ageing and Therapeutics, University of Limerick Hospital Group, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8577-3541
Margaret O'ConnorDepartment of Ageing and Therapeutics, University of Limerick Hospital Group, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9984-9204
Nathalie Missilier PeruzzoStroke Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0005-6789-9473
Olivier WaeterlootStroke Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0000-1684-3000
Friedrich MedlinStroke Unit, Division of Neurology, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8477-899X
Fabien RigoletCare training center, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0004-1445-5070
Thomas SchmutzDivision of Emergency Medicine, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2484-3531
Patrik MichelStroke Centre, Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4954-7579
Thibaut DesmettreDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4585-5494
Mélanie SuppanDivision of Anesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8807-9619
Laurent SuppanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-6421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke treatment has significantly improved over the last decades, but the complexity of stroke cases requires specialized care through dedicated teams with specific knowledge and training. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), widely used to assess neurological deficits and make treatment decisions, is reliable but requires specific training and certification. The traditional didactic training method, based on a video, may not adequately address certain NIHSS intricacies nor engage health care professionals (HCPs) in continuous learning, leading to suboptimal proficiency. In the context of time-constrained clinical settings, highly interactive e-learning could be a promising alternative for NIHSS knowledge acquisition and retention.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the efficacy of a highly interactive e-learning module compared with a traditional didactic video in improving NIHSS knowledge among previously trained HCPs. Furthermore, its impact on knowledge retention was also assessed.

methodsA prospective, multicentric, triple-blind, and web-based randomized controlled trial was conducted in 3 Swiss university hospitals, involving HCPs previously trained in NIHSS. Invitations were sent through email, and participants were randomized to either the e-learning or traditional didactic video group through a fully automated process upon self-registration on the website. A 50-question quiz was administered before and after exposure to the training method, and scores were compared to assess knowledge acquisition. The quiz was repeated after 1 month to evaluate retention. Subjective assessments of learning methods that is, user satisfaction, probability of recommendation, perceived difficulty, and perception of duration, were also collected through a Likert-scale questionnaire. A sample size of 72 participants were deemed necessary to have an 80% chance of detecting a difference of 2 points in the postcourse quiz between groups at the 5% significance level.

resultsInvitations to participate were sent through email to an estimated 325 HCPs. 174 HCPs enrolled in the study, of which 97 completed the study course. Both learning methods significantly improved NIHSS knowledge, with an improvement of 3.2 (range 2.0-4.3) points in the e-learning group and of 2.1 (1.2-3.1) points in the video group. However, the e-learning group performed better, with higher scores in knowledge acquisition (median score 39.0, IQR 36.0-41.0 vs 37, IQR 34.0-39.0; P=.03) and in knowledge retention (mean score 38.2, 95% CI 36.7-39.7 vs 35.8, 95% CI 34.8-36.8; P=.007). Participants in the e-learning group were more likely to recommend the learning method (77% vs 49%, P=.02), while no significant difference was found for satisfaction (P=.17), perceived duration (P=.17), and difficulty (P=.32).

conclusionsA highly interactive e-learning module was found to be an effective asynchronous method for NIHSS knowledge acquisition and retention in previously NIHSS-trained HCPs, and may now be considered for inclusion in NIHSS training programs for HCPs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.3390/healthcare9111460.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionEducation, DistanceHealth PersonnelInternetStrokeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Prospective StudiesUnited StatesVideo Recordinge-learningknowledge acquisitionknowledge retentionlearner satisfactionmedical educationNational Institutes of Health Stroke ScaleNIHSSrandomized controlled trialstrokevideo

Identifiers

PMID40053772
PMCPMC11920661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.