Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40053732›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Examining BRCA Previvors' Social Media Content Creation as a Form of Self and Community Care: Qualitative Interview Study.

Mariah L Wellman, Camilla M Owens, Avery E Holton, Kimberly A Kaphingst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariah L WellmanAdvertising & Public Relations, College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5089-7379
Camilla M OwensDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2076-7168
Avery E HoltonDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-0599
Kimberly A KaphingstDepartment of Communication, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-9080

Funding

Utah Center of Excellence in ELSI Research: UCEERRM1HG009037 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ROTHWELL, ERIN, TABERY, JAMES · 2016 to 2024
$8.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG009037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic testing has become a common way of identifying a woman's risk of developing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; however, not all medical providers have the necessary information to support patients interested in genetic testing, nor do they always have the proper information for patients once they have been diagnosed. Therefore, many "previvors"-the name given to those who have tested positive for the BRCA genetic mutation-have taken to social media to inform others about the importance of genetic testing and explain to them how to understand their test results. Historically, those desiring to speak about their medical issues online have sought out structured support groups or chat rooms; however, many previvors today are instead posting on their own personal social media accounts and creating more niche communities.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine why BRCA previvors are sharing content on their personal social media accounts and how posting online in this way serves a purpose for their larger community.

methodsA total of 16 semistructured interviews were conducted with individuals who posted about their experience being diagnosed with the BRCA genetic mutation and their subsequent treatment on their personal social media accounts, specifically for followers interested in their medical journey. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by an experienced qualitative researcher and a graduate student using inductive techniques, and a reflexive thematic analysis was applied to the transcripts.

resultsThe results suggest BRCA previvors want to control the narrative around their personalized medical experiences rather than participating in existing groups or chat rooms. Controlling their own story, rather than adding to existing narratives, gives previvors a sense of control. It also allows them to set boundaries around the types of experiences they have online when sharing their medical journey. Finally, previvors said they feel they are serving the larger BRCA community by each sharing their individual journeys, to hopefully avoid stereotyping and homogenizing the experience of patients with BRCA genetic mutations.

conclusionsResearch with the objective of understanding the experiences of BRCA previvors should include exploring how and why they talk about their journeys, especially due to the lack of knowledge BRCA previvors say many of their medical providers have. We suggest further research should examine how other patients with the BRCA genetic mutation, especially racial and ethnic minority patients, are navigating their own content creation, especially considering content moderation policies that social media platforms are continuing to implement that directly impact users' ability to share about their medical experiences.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Ovarian NeoplasmsSocial MediaAdultFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchBRCAbreast cancerbreast cancer genecancer previvorscommunity carecontentcontent creationgenetic mutationsgenetic testinginterviewinterviewsonlineprevivorsqualitativequalitative interviewself caresocial mediathematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID40053732
PMCPMC11914846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.