Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40053718›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Use of Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Edge Intelligence in Long-Term Care for Older People: Comprehensive Analysis Through Bibliometric, Google Trends, and Content Analysis.

Shuo-Chen Chien, Chia-Ming Yen, Yu-Hung Chang, Ying-Erh Chen, Chia-Chun Liu, Yu-Ping Hsiao, Ping-Yen Yang, Hong-Ming Lin, Tsung-En Yang, Xing-Hua Lu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shuo-Chen ChienInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4507-8445
Chia-Ming YenNational Center for Geriatrics and Welfare Research, National Health Research Institutes, Yunlin County, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9774-8634
Yu-Hung ChangInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1484-4960
Ying-Erh ChenDepartment of Risk Management and Insurance, Tamkang University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8735-0385
Chia-Chun LiuInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0009-8170-2445
Yu-Ping HsiaoInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0006-4672-791X
Ping-Yen YangInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0000-9606-7792
Hong-Ming LinInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0008-9453-7699
Tsung-En YangInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0001-1935-2431
Xing-Hua LuInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0005-1325-8646
I-Chien WuInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6916-8165
Chih-Cheng HsuInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9435-0698
Hung-Yi ChiouInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4545-9697
Ren-Hua ChungInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9835-6333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global aging population poses critical challenges for long-term care (LTC), including workforce shortages, escalating health care costs, and increasing demand for high-quality care. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and edge intelligence (EI) offers transformative potential to enhance care quality, improve safety, and streamline operations. However, existing research lacks a comprehensive analysis that synthesizes academic trends, public interest, and deeper insights regarding these technologies.

objectiveThis study aims to provide a holistic overview of AI, IoT, and EI applications in LTC for older adults through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis, public interest insights from Google Trends, and content analysis of the top-cited research papers.

methodsBibliometric analysis was conducted using data from Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus to identify key themes and trends in the field, while Google Trends was used to assess public interest. A content analysis of the top 1% of most-cited papers provided deeper insights into practical applications.

resultsA total of 6378 papers published between 2014 and 2023 were analyzed. The bibliometric analysis revealed that the United States, China, and Canada are leading contributors, with strong thematic overlaps in areas such as dementia care, machine learning, and wearable health monitoring technologies. High correlations were found between academic and public interest, in key topics such as "long-term care" (τ=0.89, P<.001) and "caregiver" (τ=0.72, P=.004). The content analysis demonstrated that social robots, particularly PARO, significantly improved mood and reduced agitation in patients with dementia. However, limitations, including small sample sizes, short study durations, and a narrow focus on dementia care, were noted.

conclusionsAI, IoT, and EI collectively form a powerful ecosystem in LTC settings, addressing different aspects of care for older adults. Our study suggests that increased international collaboration and the integration of emerging themes such as "rehabilitation," "stroke," and "mHealth" are necessary to meet the evolving care needs of this population. Additionally, incorporating high-interest keywords such as "machine learning," "smart home," and "caregiver" can enhance discoverability and relevance for both academic and public audiences. Future research should focus on expanding sample sizes, conducting long-term multicenter trials, and exploring broader health conditions beyond dementia, such as frailty and depression.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBibliometricsInternet of ThingsLong-Term CareAgedHumansartificial intelligencebibliometric analysiscontent analysisedge intelligenceGoogle TrendsInternet of Thingslong-term careolder adults

Identifiers

PMID40053718
PMCPMC11920668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.