ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
PathoSeq-QC: a decision support bioinformatics workflow for robust genomic surveillance.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How benchmarking of bioinformatics tools is essential for informed workflow selection: a case study on SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA detection.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Toward a unified approach: Considerations for bioinformatic and sequencing activities & data in wastewater surveillance of biologic public health threats.Open research Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationRecommendations on the use of genomics for pathogens surveillance are evidence that high-throughput genomic sequencing plays a key role to fight global health threats. Coupled with bioinformatics and other data types (e.g., epidemiological information), genomics is used to obtain knowledge on health pathogenic threats and insights on their evolution, to monitor pathogens spread, and to evaluate the effectiveness of countermeasures. From a decision-making policy perspective, it is essential to ensure the entire process's quality before relying on analysis results as evidence. Available workflows usually offer quality assessment tools that are primarily focused on the quality of raw NGS reads but often struggle to keep pace with new technologies and threats, and fail to provide a robust consensus on results, necessitating manual evaluation of multiple tool outputs.
resultsWe present PathoSeq-QC, a bioinformatics decision support workflow developed to improve the trustworthiness of genomic surveillance analyses and conclusions. Designed for SARS-CoV-2, it is suitable for any viral threat. In the specific case of SARS-CoV-2, PathoSeq-QC: (i) evaluates the quality of the raw data; (ii) assesses whether the analysed sample is composed by single or multiple lineages; (iii) produces robust variant calling results via multi-tool comparison; (iv) reports whether the produced data are in support of a recombinant virus, a novel or an already known lineage. The tool is modular, which will allow easy functionalities extension. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PathoSeq-QC is a command-line tool written in Python and R. The code is available at https://code.europa.eu/dighealth/pathoseq-qc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.