ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
PROLONG: penalized regression for outcome guided longitudinal omics analysis with network and group constraints.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sparse time-varying log-ratios for longitudinal high-throughput sequencing data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThere is a growing interest in longitudinal omics data paired with some longitudinal clinical outcome. Given a large set of continuous omics variables and some continuous clinical outcome, each measured for a few subjects at only a few time points, we seek to identify those variables that co-vary over time with the outcome. To motivate this problem we study a dataset with hundreds of urinary metabolites along with Tuberculosis mycobacterial load as our clinical outcome, with the objective of identifying potential biomarkers for disease progression. For such data clinicians usually apply simple linear mixed effects models which often lack power given the low number of replicates and time points. We propose a penalized regression approach on the first differences of the data that extends the lasso + Laplacian method [Li and Li (Network-constrained regularization and variable selection for analysis of genomic data. Bioinformatics 2008;24:1175-82.)] to a longitudinal group lasso + Laplacian approach. Our method, PROLONG, leverages the first differences of the data to increase power by pairing the consecutive time points. The Laplacian penalty incorporates the dependence structure of the variables, and the group lasso penalty induces sparsity while grouping together all contemporaneous and lag terms for each omic variable in the model.
resultsWith an automated selection of model hyper-parameters, PROLONG correctly selects target metabolites with high specificity and sensitivity across a wide range of scenarios. PROLONG selects a set of metabolites from the real data that includes interesting targets identified during EDA. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package implementing described methods called "prolong" is available at https://github.com/stevebroll/prolong. Code snapshot available at 10.5281/zenodo.14804245.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.