ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Understanding the Core Limitations of Second-Order Correlation-Based Functionals Through: Functional, Orbital, and Eigenvalue-Driven Analysis.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frontier Orbital Engineering in Heteroatom-Doped Prototypical Organic Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2026Article
- Toward Doubly Local Double Hybrid Functionals Using Neural-Network Local Mixing Functions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Understanding DFT Uncertainties for More Reliable Reactivity Predictions by Advancing the Analysis of Error Sources.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Simplified, Physically Motivated, and Broadly Applicable Range-Separation Tuning.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- An Analysis of Regularized Second-Order Energy Expressions in the Context of Post-HF and KS-DFT Calculations: What Do We Gain and What Do We Lose?Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Density functional theory has long struggled to obtain the exact exchange-correlational functional. Numerous approximations have been designed in the hope of achieving chemical accuracy. However, designing a functional involves numerous methodologies, which have a greater possibility for error accumulation if the functionals are poorly formulated. This study aims to investigate the performance and limitations of second-order correlation functionals within the framework of density functional theory. Specifically, we focus on three major classes of density functional approximations that incorporate second-order energy expressions: ab initio (primarily Görling-Levy) functionals, adiabatic connection models, and double-hybrid functionals. The principal objectives of this research are to evaluate the accuracy of second-order correlation functionals, to understand how the choice of reference orbitals and eigenvalues affects the performance of these functionals, to identify the intrinsic limitations of second-order energy expressions, especially when using arbitrary orbitals or noncanonical configurations, and to propose strategies for improving their accuracy. By addressing these questions, we aim to provide deeper insights into the factors governing the accuracy of second-order correlation functionals, thereby guiding future functional development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.