Trial reportAdvances in therapy2025
A Multicenter Single-Arm Study of Switching to Ferric Citrate Hydrate for Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients Intolerant to Oral Iron: RIO-SWITCH.
Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTreatment interruptions due to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common in iron deficiency anemia (IDA). We evaluated medication completion rates and quality of life (QoL) changes in patients with IDA after starting ferric citrate hydrate (FCH) treatment.
methodsThis multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, single-arm comparative study included 30 Japanese female patients with IDA who experienced nausea and/or vomiting (N/V) with previous oral iron preparations. Patients received FCH 500 mg orally daily (< 1000 mg/day). Those with hemoglobin levels ≥ 11.0 g/dl completed the study at week 4; others continued until week 8. The primary endpoint was medication completion rate. Secondary endpoints included medication compliance rate, treatment satisfaction scores, and QoL scores and changes.
resultsThirty patients initiated and completed treatment; 24 reached ≥ 11.0 g/dl hemoglobin at week 4 and ended treatment, while 6 continued until week 8. The medication compliance rate was 93.92% ± 8.11% (mean ± standard deviation [SD]), and the completion rate was 100.0% (95% confidence interval 88.4-100.0%). Questionnaire findings revealed that the most severe nausea score decreased from 5.7 ± 2.4 to 1.7 ± 2.1 (mean ± SD), N/V incidence decreased from 100.0 to 63.3%, and patients reporting that N/V did not interfere with daily life increased from 6.7 to 52.6% following the switch to FCH. Twenty-four patients (80.0%) reported a satisfactory experience with FCH versus their previous oral iron preparation. Scores for all eight subscales of the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey v2 improved, with significant increases in six. Nine ADR events occurred in six patients (20.0%), including nausea in three (10.0%); none were serious or resulted in treatment discontinuation.
conclusionFCH treatment exhibited a satisfactory medication completion rate in patients with IDA. Switching to FCH reduced N/V incidence and improved N/V and QoL severity compared with previous oral iron preparations.
trial registrationjRCTs031210634. Registration date: March 01, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.