Observational studyAnnals of nuclear medicine2025
Ga-68 Pentixafor PET/CT in multiple myeloma and its correlation with clinical parameters: institutional pilot study.
Observational study in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Recent Updates and Advancements in the Diagnosis and Management of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias.Cureus · 2026Review
- The CXCR4-targeted theranostics era: a comprehensive review of a decade of progress (2015-2025).Theranostics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluates the role of Ga-68 Pentixafor PET/CT in staging and follow-up of multiple myeloma (MM) and its correlation with clinical parameters.
methodsThirteen participants (9 males, 4 females; median age: 65 years) with MM were recruited in this prospective observational study. Six participants were included for staging evaluation, seven were included for follow-up evaluation, and underwent Ga-68 Pentixafor PET/CT. Focal PET-positive bone marrow lesions or diffuse bone marrow uptake (uptake more than liver) was considered a positive scan. The quantitative variables like SUVmax, SUVmean, total bone marrow volume and uptake (TBMV & TBMU) and tumor to background ratio (TBRmax) were obtained. Durie Salmon Plus Staging (DSPS) was used for MM staging by PET/CT and was compared with the International Staging System (ISS). Statistical comparison was performed between PET/CT quantitative variables and laboratory parameters.
resultsTwelve participants (12/13) had positive Ga-68 Pentixafor PET/CT, among which one was diagnosed to have anemia of chronic disease. One participant (1/13) who was clinically negative on follow-up had negative Ga-68 Pentixafor PET/CT. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Ga-68 Pentixafor PET/CT in MM (95% CI) were observed to be 100%, 50%, 91.6% and 100%, respectively. The correlation between DSPS and ISS in the patients who came for staging scans was found to be statistically significant (p-value 0.02). In quantitative analysis, either of the quantitative variables in Ga-68 Pentixafor PET/CT was positively correlated with clinical parameters related to tumor burden like CRAB score, serum protein electrophoresis M-protein, beta 2 microglobulin, LDH, percentage of plasma cells infiltrates in bone marrow aspiration, ISS, serum free light chain and negatively correlated with hemoglobin, albumin (p < 0.5).
conclusionGa-68 Pentixafor PET/CT is a promising tracer and the only available non-invasive tool to assess the whole-body disease burden of CXCR4 receptors in staging and follow-up of MM. In addition, it has a vital role in the development of CXCR4-targeted theranostics. Dual tracer imaging using F-18 FDG and Ga-68 Pentixafor PET/CT may help in evaluating tumor heterogeneity in MM and add prognostic value at diagnosis and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40053177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.