ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Coronary Inflammation and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Diagnostic and Prognostic Impact of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- The Role of Serum Biomarkers for the Differential Diagnosis and Prognostic Assessment of Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Medical Management of Coronary Artery Disease: An Update.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2025Review
- Quantitative Coronary CT Angiography and Pericoronary Adipose Tissue in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Relationship with Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion SPECT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review evaluates the role of vascular inflammation in patients who develop myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). It also introduces pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) as possible biomarkers for risk prediction in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). RECENT
findingsPCAT and EAT contribute to the development and progression of coronary artery inflammation and plaque vulnerability. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can detect localized areas of inflammation through changes in the attenuation values of PCAT and EAT. Attenuation values can be further integrated with traditional risk factors using artificial intelligence to generate risk scores that significantly enhance prognostic accuracy in patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. Assessing PCAT and EAT inflammation via CCTA and AI-driven risk algorithms enable precise risk prediction of MINOCA and major adverse coronary events (MACE) in patients with non-obstructive CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.