SynthesisJournal of neurology2025
A dose-response meta-analysis of physical activity and the risk of alzheimer's disease in prospective studies.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association of combined ultra-processed food intake (ultra-processed dietary pattern) with cognitive function impairment: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Residential green spaces and neurodegenerative diseases in middle-aged and older adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Pooled it
- Prevention of cognitive decline and dementia: Current evidence on lifestyle factors and dietary patterns.EXCLI journal · 2026Review
- From plate to brain: role of mediators and moderators on the impact of diet on Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Construction of a classification model for dementia among Brazilian adults aged 50 and over.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Motor Imagery Training Improves Interoception and Satisfaction with Performance.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Peripheral immune and metabolic regulation of Aβ and Tau by exercise in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Exercise training exerts beneficial effects on Alzheimer's disease through multiple signaling pathways.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) has become an increasing global health challenge, particularly with the accelerated aging of the population. Therefore, preventive research targeting AD has become especially important. In recent years, physical activity (PA), as a potential non-pharmacological intervention, has garnered increasing attention from researchers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of PA on AD risk through systematic review and meta-analysis and to further explore its potential preventive benefits.
methodsThe literature search for this study encompassed PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, covering publications from their inception until November 1, 2024. Only English-language publications were included. Stratified analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between PA and AD risk by combining multivariate-adjusted effect estimates using random-effects models, along with subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, multifactorial meta-regression, and dose-response analyses to comprehensively assess the association between PA and the risk of AD.
resultsUltimately, 29 studies were included in the primary analysis, along with 3 additional studies for supplemental analyses, involving 1,453,561 participants, of whom 68,497 were diagnosed with AD. The results indicated that high-intensity PA significantly reduced the risk of AD by 26% (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% CI 0.67-0.83). Additionally, dose-response analyses revealed both linear and nonlinear associations, with linear dose-response results indicating a 15% reduction in AD risk for every 10 MET-h/wk increase in PA. Subgroup analyses indicated that the protective effect of PA was more pronounced in the non-obese population (BMI < 25) (HR = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.52-0.82), in individuals aged 75 years or older (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.67), and in non-APOE ε4 gene carriers (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.93), who exhibited greater protection. To explore the sources of heterogeneity among the included studies, a multifactorial meta-regression analysis was performed, which did not significantly explain the heterogeneity of the primary outcomes. Moreover, the robustness of the pooled results was confirmed through supplemental meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis.
conclusionsThe results of this study support the potential of PA in reducing the risk of AD, particularly in non-obese populations, older age groups, and non-APOE ε4 gene carriers. PA holds significant potential in public health as a feasible and low-cost non-pharmacological intervention strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40053161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.