ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Evaluation of drug-related anaphylaxis in children: multi-center study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-related differences in pediatric anaphylaxis: a single-center experience.BMC pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Severe cutaneous adverse reactions linked to medications in children and adolescents: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study is to elucidate demographic characteristics, risk factors, clinical presentations, causative agents, and management approaches pertaining to drug-related anaphylaxis in the paediatric population. This study is a multicenter retrospective study that included paediatric patients aged between 1 month and 18 years, who were admitted to the Pediatric Allergy and Immunology outpatient clinics of 11 participating centres with a presumptive diagnosis of drug-induced anaphylaxis, that fulfilled the standardised criteria for anaphylaxis, between January 2017 and December 2022. A total of 293 anaphylactic episodes presented among 265 patients, of which 48.1% (n 141) were female, were included. The median age of patients during the index episode was 107 months (IQR 56.5-161.5). Anaphylaxis occurred most frequently within hospital settings (62.1%, n 182) compared to home environments (34.1%, n 100). The administration were peroral in 40.3% (n 118), parenteral in 59.7% (n 175) of the cases. While antibiotics (56.7%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (25.7%), and chemotherapeutics (3.4%) were the most commonly suspected drug groups, the cephalosporin group, and especially ceftriaxone (27.5% [n 80]) were the leading culprits among antibiotics. The anaphylaxis severity was severe in 39.6% (n 116), and moderate in 54.9% (n 161) of episodes. A biphasic reaction occurred in five patients. Only 72% (n 213) of patients were given adrenaline treatment. There were no fatalities. Diagnostic tests (n 64), including skin prick, intradermal, and drug provocation tests, which were performed between 1 and 120 months after the index reaction, yielded positive results in 23.4% (n 15), 17.2% (n 11), and 20.3% (n 13) of cases respectively, giving a total confirmation of 39 patients. Four patients underwent suspected drug desensitisation protocols. There were no fatalities.Conclusions: Antibiotics, particularly ceftriaxone, were the most commonly implicated agents in paediatric drug-induced anaphylaxis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, particularly ibuprofen, constituted the second most frequently implicated drug group. Paediatric patients experiencing drug-related anaphylaxis warrant algorithmic evaluation to ensure accurate diagnosis, prevent recurrence, and identify safe alternative treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40053151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.