ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Barriers to vaccination - parents' attitudes towards HPV vaccination].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Awareness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for girls and boys in Germany-results of the LIEBESLEBEN study].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough HPV vaccination substantially reduces the risk of HPV-related cancer, vaccination coverage in Germany is still too low among girls and boys aged 9 to 14 years. To increase HPV vaccination coverage, it is essential to assess the attitudes of parents or guardians of children of recommended vaccination age.
methodsA representative cross-sectional survey of parents or guardians of children aged 9 to 15 years was conducted (31 May-19 July 2023). Of particular interest were the attitudes of those parents who had not (yet) had their child vaccinated against HPV (primary target group). A combined telephone and online survey was conducted in which a total of 1439 parents were interviewed, including 1000 parents of unvaccinated children.
resultsA portion of the parents is still undecided about the HPV vaccination or tend to be reluctant to have their child vaccinated against HPV (21% and 8%, respectively). 5% are opposed to the vaccination, 23% feel rather or very poorly informed about the HPV vaccination, and 22% feel neither well nor poorly informed. By far the most trusted source of information on HPV vaccination are doctors (85%). The most frequently cited reasons against HPV vaccination are a lack of public education (59%), no perceived need for vaccination at this time (46%), fear of possible side effects (40%), and the statement that the child should decide for themselves about vaccination later (39%). DISCUSSION: The suitability of communication measures for HPV vaccination should be continuously reviewed and adjusted if necessary. Doctors are highly trusted and should be supported in providing information on HPV vaccination through materials and specific training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.