ArticleDysphagia2025
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Italian Version of the Feeding-Swallowing Impact Survey for both Members of Parental Dyads.
Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using Classical Test Theory to Determine the Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Feeding/Swallowing Impact Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Feeding/Swallowing Impact Survey (FS-IS) is the first validated instrument to measure the impact of Pediatric Feeding Disorder (PFD) on their caregivers. This study aimed to translate and adapt the FS-IS into Italian (FS-IS-IT) and analyze its reliability and validity, for both fathers and mothers. The FS-IS-IT was developed using Beaton et al.'s 5-stage process. This cross-sectional study involved 32 dyads of parents of children with PFD and 15 dyads of caregivers of children with developmental disorders without PFD. Twenty caregivers completed the FS-IS-IT questionnaire twice to ensure test-retest reliability. All caregivers completed the Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) and the IDDSI Diet Functional Scale for construct validity analysis. ROC analysis was used to evaluating the diagnostic properties of FS-IS-IT in screening between dyads of children with PFD and dyads without these symptoms. The FS-IS-IT was reliable for both fathers and mothers, with satisfactory internal consistency (mothers' McDonald's ω=0.93; fathers' McDonald's ω=0.94) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.97). Moderate-to-strong statistically significant correlations (mothers: r(32)=0.73; p =.018; fathers: r(32)=-0.42; p=.018). r(32)=-0.41; p=.018). The FSIS-IT was featured by optimal diagnostics (mothers: AUC=0.97; fathers: AUC=0.94), a cut-off of 1.58 for mothers and 1.65 for fathers has shown good specificity and sensitivity. The FS-IS-IT is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of the impact of PFD and shows optimal diagnostic properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.