ArticleProtoplasma2025
Immunoreactivity of flexible and inflexible scales in different lizards indicates that the mature beta-layer contains different corneous proteins.
Article in Protoplasma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have analyzed by immunohistochemical methods the Oberhautchen-beta layer, here abbreviated as beta-layer, of lizards with hard scales and lizards with softer scales. Different antibodies for detecting Corneous Beta Proteins (CBPs) have been utilized. The agamid beta-corneous layer is generally 3-4 times thicker than in geckos, and the surface microornamentation forms a honeycomb pattern. Geckos feature thinner beta-layers and a spinulated pattern and show immunolocalization for CBPs and isopeptide bonds, a product of transglutaminase catalysis, in their thin beta-layer. CBPs and isopeptide-bonds are detected in the superficial Oberhautchen and alpha-layer of agamids while the beta-layer is immuno-negative. Considering the limitations of immunolabeling methods, the unexpected result might derive from inaccessibility of antibodies to epitopes that are masked within the packed corneous material of the agamid beta-layer. However, bioinformatics analysis for CBPs sequenced in the few species of agamids so far known indicates that these proteins have low identity with those of other lizards. This suggests that agamids possess peculiar CBPs but low isopeptide bonds in their inflexible beta-layer. In contrast, the thinner and pliable beta-corneous layers of geckos may derive from the presence of isopeptide bonds mixed with lower amounts of CBPs. The differences in material properties of lizard scales, inflexibility versus pliability, are adaptive for the different ecological conditions of the species here analyzed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40053082What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.