ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2025
Path integration and optic flow in flying insects: a review of current evidence.
Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Honeybees express foodward flight vectors after a detour.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Background optic flow modulates responses of multiple descending interneurons to object motion in locusts.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Path integration is a key navigation mechanism used by many animals, involving the integration of direction and distance of path segments to form a goal vector that allows an animal to return directly to its starting point. While well established for animals walking on solid ground, evidence for path integration in animals moving without ground contact, such as flying insects, is less clear. The review focuses on flying Hymenoptera, particularly bees, which are extensively studied. Although bees can use flight distance and direction information, evidence for genuine path integration is limited. Accurately assessing distance travelled is a major challenge for flying animals, because it relies on optic flow-the movement of visual patterns across the eye caused by locomotion. Optic flow depends on both the animal's speed and the spatial layout of the environment, making it ambiguous for precise distance measurement. While path integration is crucial for animals like desert ants navigating sparse environments with few navigational cues, we argue that flying Hymenopterans in visually complex environments, rich in objects and textures, rely on additional navigational cues rather than precise path integration. As they become more familiar with an environment, they may iteratively refine unreliable distance estimates derived from optic flow. By combining this refined information with directional cues, they could determine a goal vector and improve their ability to navigate efficiently between key locations. In the case of honeybees, this ability also enables them to communicate these refined goal vectors to other bees through the waggle dance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.