ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2025
Comparison of direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and other major radiological interventions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.
Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRadiological interventions in Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) include anatomical recanalization of the hepatic vein (HV), inferior vena cava (IVC) angioplasty and stenting. In case of technical difficulty and anatomical non-feasibility, an ultrasound-guided direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPSS) is created. We aimed at evaluating the outcome of patients managed with DIPSS and comparing it with anatomical recanalization.
methodsWe retrieved the data of patients with BCS managed at our institution between 2011 and 2021. Safety, efficacy and long-term outcomes were assessed and compared between radiological interventions.
resultsTotal 236 patients with BCS underwent radiological intervention in the study period. As many as 96 patients were excluded and 140 patients were included in the final analysis. The majority were males (F:M = 54:86). The median age at the time of diagnosis was 30 years (interquartile range: 25-37 years). The median follow-up period was 58 (14-72) months. On imaging, 53% (74) patients had combined HV and IVC block followed by isolated HV block in 54 patients (38.5%) and isolated IVC block in 12 patients (8.5%). As many as 32 patients were managed by DIPSS. Among others, 56 patients underwent IVC angioplasty with HV stenting and 30 required HV angioplasty and stenting. DIPSS had a comparable technical success rate (100% vs. 98.2% vs. 96%, respectively p > 0.5). However, the median stent patency was higher in the DIPSS group (72 [48-96] months) compared to IVC angioplasty and HV stenting (46 [36-60] months; p = 0.02) and HV angioplasty-stenting (42 [30-48] months; p = 0.04) groups. They had similar re-thrombosis rates (28%, 34% and 21%, respectively; p > 0.05). Overall complications were rare (3.5%) and no patient in the DIPSS group had adverse events.
conclusionDIPSS is a safe and effective salvage procedure with an excellent long-term outcome in patients with BCS. It has a longer median stent patency compared to the anatomical recanalization group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40053055What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.