ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025
Ideal time and self-reported time to ejaculate, frequent use of virtual pornography, and disorders of ejaculation among internet users in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo, Brazil. Cross-sectional study.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlmost half (46%) of adult men living in São Paulo metropolis who responded an anonymous survey think they ejaculate earlier than it would be ideal. Only 10% watched virtual pornography frequently (every day or for several hours 2-4 days a week). No associations were found between ejaculation disorders and frequent use of virtual pornography. ■ About one in every 10 social network male users in São Paulo frequently use virtual pornography. ■ Over half of the respondents believed that the ideal time to ejaculate would be of 15 minutes or more. ■ Frequent use of virtual pornography was not associated with ejaculation disorders.
objectiveTo investigate the association between frequent use of virtual pornography, perceptions of the ideal time to ejaculate, and changes in ejaculation.
methodsAdult men living in São Paulo metropolis responded to an online anonymous survey between May 2019 and March 2020. The questions were about sociodemographics, sexual behavior, frequency and time of virtual pornography use, and responses to three instruments for assessing ejaculation disorders: self-reported estimated time from vaginal or anal penetration to ejaculation; self-assessment of what is a normal, premature, or delayed ejaculation, and the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT).
resultsOf 528 participants, 27.3% said the ideal time (for them and for the partner) to ejaculate during sex with a partner would be 6-15 minutes, and for 44.1%, longer than 15 minutes. However, 45.8% said they usually ejaculate earlier than the ideal time. Only 55 men (10.4%; 95% confidence interval, 95%CI= 7.9-13.3) participants were frequent users of virtual pornography (defined as the use during solitary masturbation for at least one hour/day every day or many hours/day two to four times/week). Frequent use of pornography was associated with not being heterosexual (odds ratio, OR= 1.81; 95%CI= 1.02-3.23), lower educational level (OR= 2.21; 95%CI= 1.12-4.32) and using virtual pornography during sexual intercourse (OR= 2.58; 95%CI= 1.21-5.48). No associations were observed between frequent virtual pornography use and ejaculation disorders.
conclusionApproximately half of the men surveyed are not satisfied with the time they take to ejaculate and around 10% of them use virtual pornography frequently, although this is not associated with ejaculation dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.