ArticleRevista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology2025
Five-year overall and specific survival of breast cancer in great Cuiaba (MT), Brazil.
Article in Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the overall and cancer-specific five-year survival rates for female breast cancer in Greater Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
methodsA non-concurrent, population-based cohort study using the Population-Based Cancer Registry of Greater Cuiabá (Cuiabá and Varzea Grande), including women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2008 to 2013, followed through 2018 in the regional mortality database. The sample consisted of a total of 1,220 women. Five-year survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the Cox proportional hazards regression model, computing hazard ratios for variable estimation. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test (p<0.05). Probabilistic linkage technique by the RecLink III software and survival analysis were conducted using STATA software version 12.0.
resultsThere was no statistical difference between the overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (SS) rates (OS 78.0%, 95%CI 75.6-80.2; SS 81.0%, 95%CI 78.7-83.2). Women with lower educational levels (OS=58.33%; SS=64.89%) and those without a partner (OS 64.81%; SS 70.41%) exhibited poorer survival.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that educational level and marital status significantly impact both overall and cancer-specific survival rates for female breast cancer. There is a need to propose policies that address the profile of women with lower survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.