ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Checkpoint kinases regulate the circadian clock after DNA damage by influencing chromatin dynamics.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Circadian clock and cancer.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Cocaine remodels mFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- CHK1 as a Metabolic and Immunological Regulator: Implications for Cancer Therapy.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Paf1C regulates the Neurospora circadian clock by promoting the transcription elongation of frequency.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- AoChk1 Is Required for Sporulation, Trap Formation, and Metabolic Process inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interplay between circadian clocks, the cell cycle, and DNA repair has been extensively documented, yet the epigenetic control of circadian clocks by DNA damage responses remains relatively unexplored. Here, we showed that checkpoint kinases CHK1/2 regulate chromatin structure during DNA damage in Neurospora crassa to maintain robust circadian rhythms. Under DNA damage stress, deletion of chk1/2 disrupted the rhythmic transcription of the clock gene frq by suppressing the rhythmic binding of the transcription activator White Collar complex (WCC) at the frq promoter, as the chromatin structure remained condensed. Mechanistically, CHK1/2 interacted with WC-2 and were recruited by WCC to bind at the frq promoter to phosphorylate H3T11, promoting H3 acetylation, especially H3K56 acetylation, to counteract the histone variant H2A.Z deposition, thereby establishing a suitable chromatin state to maintain robust circadian rhythms despite DNA damage. Additionally, a genome-wide correlation was discovered between H3T11 phosphorylation and H3K56 acetylation, showing a specific function at the frq promoter that is dependent on CHK1/2. Furthermore, transcriptome analysis revealed that CHK1/2 are responsible for robust rhythmic transcription of metabolic and DNA repair genes during DNA damage. These findings highlight the essential role of checkpoint kinases in maintaining robust circadian rhythms under DNA damage stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.