ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2025
The benefits of sharing house-tree-fire-water-person drawings with parents when their anxious child is in sandplay therapy.
Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The benefits of sharing house-tree-fire-water-person drawings with parents when their anxious child is in sandplay therapy.Psychology and psychotherapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe purpose of this study is to critically reflect on the value of the House-Tree-Fire-Water-Person (HTFWP) drawing as a tool to engage the parents of children aged 10-12 in sandplay therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). To do so, we draw on empirical work that addressed gaps in the existing parent-psychologist alliance literature by exploring the usefulness of sharing the HTFWP drawing series with parents at feedback sessions.
methodsWe employed an instrumental, multiple case study design. The sample consisted of 7 cases, involving parents (n = 9) and child-clients referred for GAD (n = 7). Parent-generated data included the verbatim transcripts of initial semi-structured interviews, three HTFWP drawing elicitation conversations (i.e. HTFWP-facilitated feedback sessions) and a post-intervention semi-structured interview. Child-generated data included three HTFWP drawings and child-driven explanations of these drawings. Psychologist-generated data included journal-recorded reflections and process notes. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we identified patterns in these data.
resultsFindings suggest that an alliance created between parent and psychologist through sharing the HTFWP drawing series with parents was a win for everyone (parents, child and psychologist). This 'win-win' situation included enhanced care for the child, bolstered parental support and heightened efficacy for the psychologist.
conclusionThe HTFWP drawing has high potential to support the therapeutic process, with emphasis on its facilitation of a parent -psychologist alliance and spillover benefits for parents, the treating psychologist and the child-client.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.