ArticleDrug and alcohol review2025
Patterns of opioid prescribing to opioid-naive patients after surgical and emergency care: A population-based cross-sectional study using linked administrative databases in Nova Scotia (2017-2019).
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns of opioid prescribing to opioid-naive patients after surgical and emergency care: A population-based cross-sectional study using linked administrative databases in Nova Scotia (2017-2019).Drug and alcohol review · 2025Article
- Data resource profile: PharmaNet, the database for prescription drug dispensing in British Columbia, Canada.International journal of population data science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo describe opioid prescribing patterns for opioid-naive patients who filled prescriptions after surgical or emergency care.
methodsWe conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of opioid-naive adults who filled opioid prescriptions within 14 days of receiving surgical or emergency care in Nova Scotia, Canada. Using linked administrative databases, we estimated the prevalence of opioid prescriptions with >7 days' supply, ≥90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day or long-acting opioids. We assessed the association of care setting and specialty with these outcomes.
resultsAmong 124,515 patients, 36,716 (29.5%) were opioid-naive. The median opioid supply duration was 3 days (IQR 2-5), the median dose was 50 MME/day (IQR 30-75). Prescriptions for >7 days, ≥90 MME/day or involving long-acting opioids were filled by 10.9%, 20.2% and 0.7% of the patients, respectively. Hydromorphone (50%) and codeine (26.4%) were the most filled opioids. The emergency care setting had double the odds of filling >7 days' supply (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.99-2.28), and 69% lower chance of filling ≥90 MME/day (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.29-0.33) than surgical care. In the surgical care setting, there was significant variation across medical specialties. Otolaryngology was associated with a higher chance of prescribing >7 days' opioid supply than general surgery (OR 4.89, 95% CI 3.86-6.20). Orthopaedic surgery had a higher likelihood of ≥90 MME/day prescriptions (OR 2.92, 95% CI 2.58-3.30) than general surgery. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsOpioid prescribing patterns vary significantly by setting and specialty in Nova Scotia, Canada. Our results emphasise the need for tailored guidelines that consider clinical context and specialty to enhance patient safety and reduce opioid misuse risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.