ArticleAutophagy2025
To degrade or not to degrade: how phase separation modulates selective autophagy.
Article in Autophagy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid-liquid phase separation in cancer therapy resistance.iScience · 2026Review
- Galectin-3 directs mitophagy in response to Parkin-/proteasome-dependent rupture of mitochondrial outer membrane.Biology direct · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selective macroautophagy/autophagy relies on newly formed double-membrane compartments, known as phagophores, to sequester and recycle diverse cellular components, including organelles, biomolecular condensates and protein aggregates, maturing into autophagosomes that fuse with the vacuole/lysosome. Autophagosomes originate at the cargo-vacuole/ER interface, where autophagy factors assemble into the phagophore assembly site (PAS). However, how autophagy proteins organize on the surface of structurally and biophysically different cargoes, and achieve spatial confinement at the PAS to support autophagosome formation remains unclear. Mechanisms governing cargo selection are also poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that receptor mobility, driven by low affinity cargo-receptor interactions, is crucial for rendering cellular structures degradable by autophagy. We show that cargo surface mobility, combined with the phase separation of scaffold proteins, drives the formation of early PAS precursors, termed "initiation hubs". These hubs dynamically rearrange at the cargo-vacuole/ER interface to promote autophagosome biogenesis, providing new insights into selective autophagy initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.