Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40052649›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

Postoperative Radiation With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Multiple Intermediate Risks: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Thun Leewiboonsilp, Chuleepon Jianpinijnan, Nintita Sripaiboonkij Thokanit, Poompis Pattaranutaporn, Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thun LeewiboonsilpDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chuleepon JianpinijnanDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nintita Sripaiboonkij ThokanitRamathibodi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Poompis PattaranutapornDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nuttapong NgamphaiboonDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6535-6345

Funding

Health Systems Research Institute 63-140Mahidol University Government Research Grant #3484 (Project #6908)National Research Council of ThailandNational Science Research Fund (NSRF) via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation B05F650041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit of postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) over radiotherapy (RT) alone remains unclear for resected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) patients with intermediate risk(s) such as pT3 or pT4 primary, pN2 or pN3 nodal disease, nodal disease in levels IV or V, perineural invasion (PNI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). This study aims to evaluate the benefits of postoperative CRT in patients with multiple intermediate risks.

methodLA-HNSCC patients who underwent curative surgery with intermediate risk at our institution were identified. A propensity score-matched (PSM) method was performed using treatment, sex, age, AJCC staging, LVI, and PNI as covariates.

resultA total of 162 eligible patients were identified. After PSM, 48 patients were classified into CRT and RT groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics and treatment were well balanced. In the CRT group, most patients received cisplatin-CRT (67%). Patients with 1, 2, and ≥ 3 intermediate risk factors exhibited significantly different event-free survival (EFS) (7.2 vs. 3.8 vs. 1.9 years; p = 0.007), with a trend towards differences in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.068). The median OS of the postoperative RT and CRT groups was not significantly different (4.5 vs. 5.0 years; p = 0.950). Similarly, the median EFS was not significantly different (p = 0.634). No EFS and OS benefits were demonstrated in patients with ≥ 2 intermediate risk factors treated with CRT compared to RT alone.

conclusionIn our PSM study, LA-HNSCC patients with intermediate risk(s) did not benefit from postoperative CRT compared to RT alone. Although patients with multiple intermediate risks had significantly worse survivals, postoperative CRT did not improve OS and EFS. The results of this study may support avoiding unnecessary acute and late toxicity associated with adding chemotherapy to postoperative RT in patients with intermediate risk(s).

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyHead and Neck NeoplasmsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsadjuvantchemoradiotherapyCRThead and neck squamous cell carcinomaHNSCCintermediate risklocally advancedpostoperativeradiationradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40052649
PMCPMC11886883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.