ArticleChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025
Size-Dependent Ultrafast UV Photochemistry of Aliphatic Disulfides in Solution.
Article in Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Photoassisted Chemical Transformation of CuACS materials Au · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have investigated the photochemistry of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) and glutathione disulfide (GSSG) in solution upon ultraviolet (UV) excitation in comparison to L-cystine by femtosecond X-ray absorption spectroscopy at the sulfur K-edge. For these aliphatic disulfides, the very similar differential absorption spectra reveal unequivocally a pair of geminate thiyl radicals as the single primary reaction product with a formation time constant of about 100 fs. We find size-dependent majority yields for disulfide recombination with DMDS reforming ten-fold slower and at lower quantum yield than L-cystine while GSSG recombines even faster than L-cystine at a yield of nearly 80 % within 2 ps after excitation. We attribute the much lower recombination rates and yields of DMDS to larger product separation after homolytic S-S bond cleavage due to the smaller thiyl radical mass and correspondingly larger mutual acceleration. Furthermore, we observe the delayed formation of at least one additional reaction product for these disulfides that we attribute to perthiyl radicals. The ultrafast recombination of L-cystine and GSSG at majority yield in condensed phase suggests a dynamic S-S bond integrity which may be exploited in natural systems to mitigate UV radiation damage, and which could be of interest in materials design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.