Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40052630›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2025

Women's Experiences of Induction of Labor and Birth After Prolonged Medical Induction: A Qualitative Study From Denmark.

Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl, Lone Hvidman, Rikke Bek Helmig, Sidsel Boie, Anna Højkjær Larsen, Maria Lundbo, Jeanette Ziska, Stina Lou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caroline Trillingsgaard MejdahlDEFACTUM-Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lone HvidmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rikke Bek HelmigDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sidsel BoieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Anna Højkjær LarsenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Maria LundboDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Jeanette ZiskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Stina LouDEFACTUM-Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6177-5780

Funding

Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing frequency of induction of labor (IOL) prompts explorations into women's experiences. To inform individualized obstetric care, this study aimed to investigate the experiences of Danish pregnant women who underwent out-patient medical IOL and were not in active labor 48 h after IOL initiation.

methodsA qualitative interview study with 28 women who had experienced prolonged IOL (all indications). The women were recruited at two obstetric departments approximately 48 h after IOL initiation and telephone interviewed 2-6 weeks after birth (average of 37 min duration). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsThe first theme describes the underlying rationale in the women's description of IOL and birth: 'Motivated by the birth of a healthy baby.' The results show how the women accepted medical indications for IOL, found comfort in the out-patient regimen, and felt secure about the health of their baby, even if the prolonged IOL was frustrating. The results show how 'progress' became a primary motivator for suggesting and accepting interventions. The second theme describes four 'Situations of discouragement' that are clusters of events during IOL and birth that could challenge the women's expectations and boundaries, for example, experiencing excessive pain or not feeling heard. Despite challenges, most women viewed their experiences positively, remaining open to future IOL. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the complexity of women's experiences during IOL and birth, emphasizing the need for healthcare professionals to navigate diverse, individual preferences while prioritizing maternal and fetal well-being.

Indexed as

Labor, InducedParturitionPregnant PeopleAdultDenmarkFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPatient SatisfactionPregnancyQualitative ResearchTime FactorsYoung Adultexperiencesinduction of laborout‐patient inductionqualitative researchwomen

Identifiers

PMID40052630
PMCPMC12612355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.