Trial reportJapanese journal of clinical oncology2025
Impact of clinically diagnosed liver cirrhosis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with systemic chemotherapy: a subgroup analysis of JCOG1113.
Trial report in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe JCOG1113, a multicenter, randomized phase III trial in patients with advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer showed the non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 to gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Although liver cirrhosis (LC) is a known risk factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), few reports focus on the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in ICC patients with LC.
methodsWe performed a subgroup analysis of ICC patients enrolled in the JCOG1113. The presence or absence of LC was evaluated based on clinical factors such as radiographic findings, medical history, laboratory data, and physical examination at enrollment. We evaluated differences in the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy according to the presence or absence of clinically diagnosed LC.
resultsOf the 94 eligible patients with ICC, 10 were clinically diagnosed with LC. In the non-LC/clinically diagnosed LC group, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, decreased platelet count, and non-hematological adverse events were observed in 51.2%/60%, 15.5%/0%, 11.9%/40%, and 38.1%/30% patients. The median overall survival was 13.7 months in the non-LC group and 19.0 months in the clinically diagnosed LC group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.969, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.482-1.948). The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months in the non-LC group and 7.1 months in the clinically diagnosed LC group (HR, 0.995; 95% CI, 0.513-1.929).
conclusionThe results of this study indicated that eligible ICC patients with clinically diagnosed LC, as determined by clinical and CT imaging findings, did not exhibit any apparent safety or efficacy disadvantage compared to those without LC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.