Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40052518›Full record

ArticleInternational health2025

Large language models for analyzing open text in global health surveys: why children are not accessing vaccine services in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Roy Burstein, Eric Mafuta, Joshua L Proctor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roy BursteinInstitute for Disease Modeling, Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington 98109  USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8991-4762
Eric MafutaKinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa H8Q3+2HV, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Joshua L ProctorInstitute for Disease Modeling, Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington 98109  USA.

Funding

Gates FoundationGavi The Vaccine AllianceUNICEFUnited States Agency for International Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluates the use of large language models (LLMs) to analyze free-text responses from large-scale global health surveys, using data from the Enquête de Couverture Vaccinale (ECV) household coverage surveys from 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 as a case study.

methodsWe tested several LLM approaches consisting of zero-shot and few-shot prompting, fine-tuning, and a natural language processing approach using semantic embeddings, to analyze responses on the reasons caregivers did not vaccinate their children.

resultsPerformance ranged from 61.5% to 96% based on testing against a curated benchmarking dataset drawn from the ECV surveys, with accuracy improving when LLMs were fine-tuned or provided examples for few-shot learning. We show that even with as few as 20-100 examples, LLMs can achieve high accuracy in categorizing free-text responses.

conclusionsThis approach offers significant opportunities for reanalyzing existing datasets and designing surveys with more open-ended questions, providing a scalable, cost-effective solution for global health organizations. Despite challenges with closed-source models and computational costs, the study underscores LLMs' potential to enhance data analysis and inform global health policy.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHealth SurveysLanguageNatural Language ProcessingVaccinationChildChild, PreschoolDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleGlobal HealthHumansLarge Language ModelsMalegenerative AIimmunizationlarge language modelssurvey methodology

Identifiers

PMID40052518
PMCPMC12406778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.