Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40052347›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2025

Insight into the environmental cues modulating the expression of bacterial toxin-antitoxin systems.

Emeline Ostyn, Yoann Augagneur, Marie-Laure Pinel-Marie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Insights into toxin-antitoxin systems in the genusApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Prokaryotic homeostasis - a solution to thrive and survive.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emeline OstynUniv Rennes, INSERM, BRM- UMR_S 1230, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Yoann AugagneurUniv Rennes, INSERM, BRM- UMR_S 1230, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Marie-Laure Pinel-MarieUniv Rennes, INSERM, BRM- UMR_S 1230, F-35000 Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5128-0741

Funding

FRM FDT202304016391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria require sophisticated sensing mechanisms to adjust their metabolism in response to stressful conditions and survive in hostile environments. Among them, toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems play a crucial role in bacterial adaptation to environmental challenges. TA systems are considered as stress-responsive elements, consisting of both toxin and antitoxin genes, typically organized in operons or encoded on complementary DNA strands. A decrease in the antitoxin-toxin ratio, often triggered by specific stress conditions, leads to toxin excess, disrupting essential cellular processes and inhibiting bacterial growth. These systems are categorized into eight types based on the nature of the antitoxin (RNA or protein) and the mode of action of toxin inhibition. While the well-established biological roles of TA systems include phage inhibition and the maintenance of genetic elements, the environmental cues regulating their expression remain insufficiently documented. In this review, we highlight the diversity and complexity of the environmental cues influencing TA systems expression. A comprehensive understanding of how these genetic modules are regulated could provide deeper insights into their functions and support the development of innovative antimicrobial strategies.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ToxinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialToxin-Antitoxin SystemsBacterial Toxinsantibioticsenvironmental cueshost immunitymicrobial communityregulationtoxin–antitoxin systems

Identifiers

PMID40052347
PMCPMC11951105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.