ArticleBipolar disorders2025
Multimodal Machine Learning Prediction of 12-Month Suicide Attempts in Bipolar Disorder.
Article in Bipolar disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning approaches in the therapeutic outcome prediction in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Construction and Verification of a Risk Prediction Model for Suicidal Ideation in Patients With Bipolar Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis.Alpha psychiatry · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Model for Predicting Suicide Risks Among Patients With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Who Received Opioids.Depression and anxiety · 2026Article
- Neural Circuit Taxonomy and Precision Psychiatry in Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Integrating thyroid function and psychometric profiles for lifetime suicide-attempt risk stratification in bipolar disorder: A multi-algorithm machine-learning study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBipolar disorder (BD) patients present an increased risk of suicide attempts. Most current machine learning (ML) studies predicting suicide attempts are cross-sectional, do not employ time-dependent variables, and do not assess more than one modality. Therefore, we aimed to predict 12-month suicide attempts in a sample of BD patients, using clinical and brain imaging data.
methodsA sample of 163 BD patients were recruited and followed up for 12 months. Gray matter volumes and cortical thickness were extracted from the T1-weighted images. Based on previous literature, we extracted 56 clinical and demographic features from digital health records. Support Vector Machine was used to differentiate BD subjects who attempted suicide. First, we explored single modality prediction (clinical features, GM, and thickness). Second, we implemented a multimodal stacking-based data fusion framework.
resultsDuring the 12 months, 6.13% of patients attempted suicide. The unimodal classifier based on clinical data reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 and balanced accuracy (BAC) of 72.7%. The model based on GM reached an AUC of 0.86 and BAC of 76.4%. The multimodal classifier (clinical + GM) reached an AUC of 0.88 and BAC of 83.4%, significantly increasing the sensitivity. The most important features were related to suicide attempts history, medications, comorbidities, and depressive polarity. In the GM model, the most relevant features mapped in the frontal, temporal, and cerebellar regions.
conclusionsBy combining models, we increased the detection of suicide attempts, reaching a sensitivity of 80%. Combining more than one modality proved a valid method to overcome limitations from single-modality models and increasing overall accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.