Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40052192›Full record

Observational studyHealth services research2025

Coordination and Integration of Providers Across Sectors Improves Referrals to and Connections With Services for Clients Engaged in Home Visiting.

Venice Ng Williams, Michael D Knudtson, Mandy A Allison, Gregory J Tung

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Venice Ng WilliamsPrevention Research Center for Family & Child Health, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2328-3579
Michael D KnudtsonPrevention Research Center for Family & Child Health, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Mandy A AllisonPrevention Research Center for Family & Child Health, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Gregory J TungDepartment of Health Systems, Management & Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Systems for Action research program 77429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association between cross-sector collaboration among Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) home visitors and service providers, and referrals to and use of services. STUDY SETTING AND

designAn observational study of 264 local NFP agencies in 40 states, the US Virgin Islands, DC, and tribal communities was conducted. Random intercept probit regressions examined provider-specific collaboration measures and their relationship with referrals to and use of services with that provider-type, adjusting for client-, nurse-, and agency-level covariates. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Secondary data from NFP implementation from 2015 to 2021 were matched to the 2018-2021 NFP Collaboration with Community Providers panel survey, 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes, and the Index of Concentration at Extremes using 2010 census data. We included clients with their first NFP visit between January 2015 and December 2021 who completed visits through birth and did not cease program participation due to unaddressable reasons (n = 95,489). PRINCIPAL

findingsProvider-specific coordination with Early Intervention, mental health, crisis intervention, substance use treatment, and child health care promoted service referrals by 1.67% points [CI:1.08, 2.27], 2.14% points [CI:1.22, 3.06], 1.13% points [CI:0.60, 1.65], 0.86% [0.52, 1.21], and 1.13% points [CI:0.13, 2.12] respectively. Provider-specific integration promoted referrals to nutrition and housing resources by 0.08% points [CI:0.03, 0.14] and 0.98% points [CI:0.46, 1.51] respectively. Provider-specific coordination and integration were associated with families' utilization of nutrition by 1.03% points [CI:0.42, 1.65] and 0.21% points [CI:0.08, 0.35], housing resources by 1.28% points [CI:0.05, 2.50] and 0.93% points [CI:0.27, 1.60], Early Intervention by 3.11% points [CI:1.28, 4.94] and 0.45% points [CI:0.02, 0.89], and mental health services by 2.85% points [CI:1.70, 4.01] and 0.24% points [CI:0.03, 0.46]. Provider-specific relational coordination was associated with the use of substance use treatment by 3.19% points [CI:1.06, 5.32] and child health care by 1.47% points [CI:0.70, 2.23].

conclusionsStrong provider-specific collaboration is associated with increased referrals to and subsequent use of that service among families engaged in nurse home visiting, but this relationship varies by provider type.

Indexed as

House CallsReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleUnited Statescross‐sector collaborationfamilies experiencing adversitieshome visitingservice referralsservice utilization

Identifiers

PMID40052192
PMCPMC12277117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.