ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Survival Analysis of ACL Graft and Contralateral ACL Ruptures in Patients Younger Than 18 Years.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences in Graft Rupture and Subsequent Meniscal Tears Following Adolescent ACL Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Versus Hamstrings Autograft: A Retrospective Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- High Return to Activity and Low Rerupture Rates Following All-Inside Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone Marrow Aspirate, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Suture Tape Augmentation.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although high rates of graft and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures have been reported in younger patients after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), recent evidence suggests that previously reported crude event rates underestimate the actual event risk. Purpose: To report rates of graft and contralateral ACL rupture after ACLR in a large series of younger patients using survival analysis. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients aged <18 years at the time of primary ACLR were identified from a single-surgeon database over 12 years ending January 2018. Patients with a previous contralateral ACL rupture or bilateral ACL ruptures were excluded. Overall, 388 patients (204 males, 184 females) were included in the final dataset. Bespoke survey data and clinic follow-up data were used to record graft rupture and contralateral ACL rupture events. Rates of graft and contralateral ACL rupture were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Log-rank tests were used to compare survival functions between several subgroups. Results: According to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the cumulative rates at 2, 5, and 10 years for graft rupture were 11%, 17%, and 22%, and the cumulative rates for contralateral ACL injury were 7%, 19%, and 33%. Males had significantly greater rates of graft rupture than females throughout a 10-year follow-up period ( Conclusion: The present study is one of the largest consecutive series of younger patients, with one of the longest follow-up periods, reporting a high risk for a second ACL injury. Over time, the cumulative risk for contralateral ACL rupture was higher than for graft rupture. In males, the risk for contralateral ACL rupture continued to increase after 5 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.