Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40052169›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2025

International validation of a pre-transplant risk assessment tool for graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Loes Oomen, Liesbeth L de Wall, Burkhard Tönshoff, Kai Krupka, Jerome Harambat, Julien Hogan, Cécile Couchoud, Emilie Savoye, Huib de Jong, Elisabeth A M Cornelissen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Loes OomenDepartment of Urology, Division of Paediatric Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0555-104X
Liesbeth L de WallDepartment of Urology, Division of Paediatric Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Burkhard TönshoffCERTAIN Registry, Department of Paediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kai KrupkaCERTAIN Registry, Department of Paediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jerome HarambatDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Julien HoganDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Robert-Debré Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Cécile CouchoudCRISTAL Registry, Agence de La Biomédicine, Paris, France.
Emilie SavoyeCRISTAL Registry, Agence de La Biomédicine, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9098-0203
Huib de JongDepartment of Paediatric Nephrology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth A M CornelissenDepartment of Paediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Antonia H M BoutsDepartment of Paediatric Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4121-6698
Mandy G Keijzer-VeenDepartment of Paediatric Nephrology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wout F J FeitzDepartment of Urology, Division of Paediatric Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Charlotte M H H T Bootsma-RobroeksDepartment of Paediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A pre-transplant prediction model using commonly available factors is valuable for optimizing donor selection, communication, and counseling for pediatric kidney transplant (PKT) recipients. This study aims to externally validate a Dutch PKT prediction model and assess its international applicability. Materials and methods: Data from the Dutch-, CERTAIN-, and CRISTAL registries, covering PKT from 2005 to 2021, were used. The Dutch prediction model was externally validated in a German and French cohort and then adapted to these specific countries. An international prediction model was also developed using all available data. Models were based on 80% derivation cohorts and internally validated using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and calibration plots. Results: Of 3266 transplantations, 2475 (273 Dutch, 356 German, 1622 French, and 224 other) were used for analysis. Cohorts differed significantly in baseline characteristics and outcomes. Internal validation of the Dutch model showed ROC-AUC of 0.77 and 0.75 at 10 and 15 years. External validation in German and French cohorts yielded 10-year ROC-AUC of 0.63 and 0.60, respectively.Internal validation of the international prediction model showed AUC of 0.61 and 0.60 at 10 and 15 years with poor calibration, indicating inferior performance. The adapted national models showed better internal validation performance, with 10-year ROC-AUC of 0.77, 0.76, and 0.73 in Dutch, French, and German cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: The Dutch PKT prediction tool requires country-specific adaptations for use in other countries, given the diversity of clinical practice across Europe. A country-specific model is preferable to an international model in the current landscape.

Indexed as

graft survivalpediatric kidney transplantationprediction modelvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID40052169
PMCPMC11883223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.