ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Real-world treatment and retreatment patterns and outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer following nivolumab monotherapy in second line or later in France: an I-O Optimise analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03848052 (Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economic), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economic (ESME) Research Program / Academic Real World Data Platform: Evolution of the Therapeutic Care in Lung Cancer in France Since 2015
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study describes treatment and retreatment patterns and outcomes in patients in France following nivolumab as a second-line or later (2L+) treatment in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (LAM NSCLC). Materials and methods: This analysis included adults with tumor, node, metastasis stage IIIB-IV NSCLC (as defined in the 7th or 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control) treated with nivolumab monotherapy in 2L+ using data from the retrospective Epidemiological-Strategy and Medical Economics Lung Cancer database. The inclusion period was from January 1, 2015, to September 30, 2020, with a follow-up until September 30, 2021. Analyses were stratified according to the duration of index nivolumab treatment and tumor programmed death ligand 1 expression levels. Results: In total, the study included 4,001 patients (68% male; mean age [standard deviation] at index date, 63.6 [9.7] years) with a median follow-up of 34.3 months. The median nivolumab duration was 2.5 months (interquartile range, 1.4-6.3). The median overall survival (OS) from nivolumab initiation was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6-10.8). The median real-world progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation or death (95% CI) were 2.2 (2.1-2.3) and 2.7 (2.5-2.8) months, respectively. In total, 2,985 (74.6%) patients discontinued index nivolumab treatment: 226 (7.6% of discontinuers) received a further immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI; 12.3% of discontinuers receiving further systemic treatment), and 1,604 (53.7%) received chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy. The proportion of ICI-retreated patients was the highest among those with the longest index treatment duration (15.8% among discontinuers receiving ≥26 weeks' index nivolumab). The median OS from retreatment was longer in the resumption (ICI restart without another therapy for ≥6 weeks) compared with the rechallenge (ICI restart following non-ICI therapy) patient subgroup. Conclusion: Few patients with LAM NSCLC in France received ICI retreatment following index nivolumab discontinuation, but the proportion increased with a longer duration of index nivolumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.