ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Is transphyseal intramedullary fixation of the distal radius in pediatric fractures a safe procedure? An MRI study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why it's better to believe in a larger definition of the diametaphyseal junction zone in pediatric distal radius fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Intramedullary versus crossed pinning for paediatric distal radius fractures: clinical decision patterns and biomechanical validation integrating real-world practice with growth plate stress finite element analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radius and ulna fractures are very common in the pediatric population. Despite the use of pinning through the growth plate, which was proposed in the past and is still being used to treat these fractures, an instrumental validation to define this procedure as safe has not yet been done. Because of this, in the absence of reliable data regarding the passage of fixation devices through the growth plate, most surgical techniques used for treating radius and ulna fractures are based on absolute respect for the growth cartilage. We conducted an MRI pilot study to evaluate the presence of any growth disturbances, bone bridge formation across the physis, or premature closure of the cartilage, to verify the correlation between wire diameter and the percentage of lesions tolerated by the growth plate and to confirm the safety of the trans-physeal pinning procedure. To specifically avoid the wrist fracture healing process near the growth plate as possible bias of the study, we enrolled only patients with mid-shaft forearm fractures. Materials and methods: We evaluated 26 patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures who underwent intramedullary percutaneous transphyseal fixation of the distal radius with a Kirschner wire. Intramedullary K-wire and plaster cast were removed, without a second surgery or anesthesia, about 35-40 days after surgery. A clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months from surgery. We conducted a comparative MRI evaluation of both wrists 12 months after the removal of the K-wire to exclude any growth plate damage related to the passage of the wire through it. Results: clinical data underlined excellent results in most patients. Radiographic healing was achieved in all cases at three months. No significative cartilage disturbances related to the procedure were found in any patient. An asymmetrical bridge that did not correspond to the wire position was found in some older patients, probably related to the initial phase of the growth plate closure process. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the percutaneous trans-physeal technique could become a valid alternative to the standard method, offering a rapid learning curve, shorter surgical times, and reduced healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.