ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Estimating the Number of Primary vs Incidental COVID-19 Hospitalizations in Santa Clara County.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), discharge data can be used to accurately differentiate primary coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalizations, which are specifically due to COVID-19, from incidental COVID-19 hospitalizations for monitoring COVID-19 trends in a large county health department. We sought to explore the use of machine learning algorithms for enhancing surveillance capabilities in a local public health setting. Methods: Discharge data for 5122 Santa Clara County hospitalizations with a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 polymerase chain reaction or antigen test occurring between December 15, 2021, and August 15, 2022, were used to train a series of models for classifying primary COVID-19 hospitalizations using chart review as a gold standard. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used as the evaluation metric. Results: Each model performed well when trained on the full set of available predictors. AUROC values ranged from 0.808 (random forest) to 0.818 (SuperLearner). After evaluating each model, we implemented a reporting process based on Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression, as the performance was comparable with SuperLearner and it had the advantage of being transparent and familiar to health department staff. Conclusions: In Santa Clara County, ICD-10 discharge data were successfully used to develop a low-burden method for monitoring primary COVID-19 hospitalization, demonstrating one way that predictive algorithms can help local health jurisdictions meet surveillance needs while minimizing manual effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.