Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40052063›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025

Microbiological Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Effect of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Immunocompromised Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Hongfei Zheng, Pei Peng, Shaofei Wang, Bo Zhang, Linying Yang, Yaoyao Wang, Lejun Li, Guifen Pang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongfei Zheng *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde, 67000, People's Republic of China.
Pei Peng *Shanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 201204, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-6885-571X
Shaofei WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde, 67000, People's Republic of China.
Bo ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde, 67000, People's Republic of China.
Linying YangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde, 67000, People's Republic of China.
Yaoyao WangShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 201204, People's Republic of China.
Lejun LiDepartment of Neurology, Suzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, 215008, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0157-0043
Guifen PangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde, 67000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) presents a significant public health concern, necessitating timely and precise diagnosis. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has shown promise as a powerful tool for pathogen identification in infectious diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and clinical applicability of mNGS for immunocompromised patients with CAP compared to the culture method. Methods: This study included 168 patients. We used both mNGS and conventional culture methods to identify the pathogen spectrum and evaluate diagnostic performance. Treatment regimens and clinical outcomes were meticulously documented. Results: The sensitivity of mNGS was greater than that of the culture method across all samples (79.05% vs 16.03%; Conclusion: These findings highlight the diagnostic performance of mNGS for identifying pathogens, particularly in immunocompromised patients vulnerable to infections, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

clinical effectcommunity-acquired pneumoniadiagnostic performanceimmunocompromisedmetagenomic next-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40052063
PMCPMC11883178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.