Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40052016›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2025

Preferred Working Time Models and Equal Opportunities in Gynecology and Obstetrics: Results of the Systematic Trinational FARBEN Survey.

Nikolas Tauber, Niklas Amann, Philipp Foessleitner, Amanda Klee, Claudia Becker, Rama Kiblawi, Martin Göpfert, Nora Kiessling, Nadja Taumberger, Evelin Beizermann and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Nikolas TauberDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-4592-2151
Niklas AmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Philipp FoessleitnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Amanda KleeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hietzing Clinic, Vienna, Austria.
Claudia BeckerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Winterthur Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Rama KiblawiUniversity Hospital Basel Women's Clinic, Basel, Switzerland.
Martin GöpfertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinic "Dritter Orden", Munich, Germany.
Nora KiesslingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria Clinic, Berlin, Germany.
Nadja TaumbergerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Evelin BeizermannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Natalia KrawczykDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Solveig SimowitschUniversity of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Barbara SchmalfeldtDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Bettina TothDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael MüllerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Berne (Inselspital), Berne, Switzerland.
Martin WeissDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Elisabeth ReiserDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Thomas EggimannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital of Emmental, Burgdorf, Switzerland.
Achim RodyDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Maggie Banys-PaluchowskiDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The trinational survey project conducted by the Young Forums of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Societies for Gynecology and Obstetrics aims to assess the preferences of prospective and practicing gynecologists regarding various work-time models, the compatibility of family and career, as well as parental leave. Materials and Methods: Between October 2023 and May 2024, a total of 1364 participants took part in the survey. The questionnaire consisted of 62 questions covering topics such as the workplace in general, work-time models, training priorities, team compositions, and professional goals. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. Results: Of the 1364 participants, 75.3% were employed in Germany, 12.9% in Austria, and 11.8% in Switzerland. Men were significantly more likely to aspire to a chief physician position compared to women (26.5% vs. 3.6%; p < 0.001). Only 12.5% of participants overall preferred full-time employment, although 63.0% of residents worked full-time. Additionally, 65.4% of respondents stated that their workplace did not provide childcare with flexible hours. At the same time, 76.0% valued workplace-proximate childcare as an important factor in choosing an employer. Conclusions: The results highlight heterogeneous and individual needs and priorities among all (prospective) gynecologists. At a time when individuality and equality are becoming increasingly significant, it is essential to promote work environments that meet the demands and needs of all physicians. The results should therefore be critically discussed to implement potential adjustments and improvements in practice.

Indexed as

career goalsequal opportunitiesgender differencesonline surveyworking time models

Identifiers

PMID40052016
PMCPMC11882312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.