ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Abusive Head Trauma Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP): Rehma's Story.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical Child Abuse Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Abusive Bruising and Cutaneous Mimics Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Abusive head trauma (AHT) is the leading cause of death from head injuries in children under 2 years and a critically undertaught topic in medical education. Methods: We created an interactive module on AHT for medical students, residents, and physicians who treat children. We evaluated the module in three formats: individual, self-paced completion by a multidisciplinary (primarily physician) audience; presentation to a small multidisciplinary (primarily physician) audience at a Child and Adolescent Neurology (CAN) educational conference; and presentation to a large group of first-year medical students as part of a neuropsychology and development course. All versions took 45 minutes. A five-question pre- and postmodule assessment was completed to measure participants' confidence levels and knowledge pertaining to AHT. Results: Twenty-four individual, self-paced participants, 10 CAN educational conference attendees, and 62 medical students participated in the AHT module. Among the largest group (medical students), the median confidence level pertaining to AHT demonstrated a modest increase from 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.00-5.00) to 6 (IQR: 6.00-7.75) on a 10-point Likert-type scale. The proportion of medical students answering knowledge questions correctly increased for every question: 27% to 84%, 50% to 90%, 2% to 90%, and 79% to 96%. Among the audiences composed of primarily physicians (i.e., the CAN conference and individual participants), baseline knowledge and confidence scores tended to be higher than the medical students and exhibited increases for every metric. Discussion: This interactive module about AHT was associated with increased confidence and knowledge for a variety of medical audiences and delivery formats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.