Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40051983›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroergonomics2025

Evaluating robotic actions: spatiotemporal brain dynamics of performance assessment in robot-assisted laparoscopic training.

Katharina Lingelbach, Jennifer Rips, Lennart Karstensen, Franziska Mathis-Ullrich, Mathias Vukelić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katharina LingelbachApplied Neurocognitive Systems, Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO, Stuttgart, Germany.
Jennifer RipsApplied Neurocognitive Systems, Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO, Stuttgart, Germany.
Lennart KarstensenDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen, Germany.
Franziska Mathis-UllrichDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen, Germany.
Mathias VukelićApplied Neurocognitive Systems, Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Enhancing medical robot training traditionally relies on explicit feedback from physicians to identify optimal and suboptimal robotic actions during surgery. Passive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) offer an emerging alternative by enabling implicit brain-based performance evaluations. However, effectively decoding these evaluations of robot performance requires a comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal brain dynamics identifying optimal and suboptimal robot actions within realistic settings. Methods: We conducted an electroencephalographic study with 16 participants who mentally assessed the quality of robotic actions while observing simulated robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery scenarios designed to approximate real-world conditions. We aimed to identify key spatiotemporal dynamics using the surface Laplacian technique and two complementary data-driven methods: a mass-univariate permutation-based clustering and multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA)-based temporal decoding. A second goal was to identify the optimal time interval of evoked brain signatures for single-trial classification. Results: Our analyses revealed three distinct spatiotemporal brain dynamics differentiating the quality assessment of optimal vs. suboptimal robotic actions during video-based laparoscopic training observations. Specifically, an enhanced left fronto-temporal current source, consistent with P300, LPP, and P600 components, indicated heightened attentional allocation and sustained evaluation processes during suboptimal robot actions. Additionally, amplified current sinks in right frontal and mid-occipito-parietal regions suggested prediction-based processing and conflict detection, consistent with the oERN and interaction-based ERN/N400. Both mass-univariate clustering and MVPA provided convergent evidence supporting these neural distinctions. Discussion: The identified neural signatures propose that suboptimal robotic actions elicit enhanced, sustained brain dynamics linked to continuous attention allocation, action monitoring, conflict detection, and ongoing evaluative processing. The findings highlight the importance of prioritizing late evaluative brain signatures in BCIs to classify robotic actions reliably. These insights have significant implications for advancing machine-learning-based training paradigms.

Indexed as

current source density (CSD)electroencephalography (EEG)machine learningpassive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs)performance monitoringrobot trainingspatio-temporal clusteringtemporal decoding

Identifiers

PMID40051983
PMCPMC11880255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.