ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
New Paradigms in Rejection Monitoring: Lymphocyte Subsets as Noninvasive Graft Markers in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rituximab-based Induction in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: Prolonged Rejection-free Survival and the Role of Donor-specific Antibodies.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Diagnostic modalities in vascularized composite allotransplantation: from histopathology to multimodal strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Chronic Rejection in Facial Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (fVCA).Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In vascularized composite allotransplantation, face transplantation stands as a transformative intervention for patients with severe facial disfigurement. Monitoring of graft rejection, however, remains a critical challenge. This study aimed to investigate the role of lymphocyte subsets in the early detection and monitoring of graft rejection in face transplantation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 3 face transplant recipients who underwent face transplantation at our institution. Peripheral blood samples were analyzed for lymphocyte subsets at multiple time points posttransplantation. A linear mixed-effects model was used, aiming to identify any upregulation associated with episodes of graft rejection. Results: A statistically significant relationship was found between clinically treated episodes of rejection, ultimately confirmed by histology, and several lymphocytic subsets. CD3 Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that monitoring specific lymphocyte subsets offers a promising adjunct for graft surveillance that is less invasive when compared with traditionally used punch biopsies. This approach not only enhances the precision of rejection monitoring but also improves patient comfort and compliance, thereby contributing to better long-term graft outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.