ArticleCureus2025
Early Systemic Immune Response to Silicone Breast Implants Analyzed by Flow Cytometry.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A fully implantable sensorized artificial urinary bladder to restore continence and fullness monitoring.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Silicone breast implants are used in a variety of aesthetic and reconstructive procedures such as permanent implants or tissue expanders. As foreign biomaterials, they can potentially evocate either a local inflammatory reaction or a systemic immune response. This study aimed to quantify possible alterations in white blood cells and lymphocyte subpopulations in patients who underwent silicone implant-based breast augmentation through peripheral blood analysis with flow cytometry at three and 12 months postoperatively. The same patients acted as the control group with a preoperative peripheral blood collection. Methodology This retrospective study included 14 female patients (average age = 29 years; range = 18-44 years) who underwent breast augmentation with silicone implants. Flow cytometry was used to monitor their immunologic reactions. Peripheral blood samples were obtained before, three months, and 12 months after the operation. Flow cytometric analysis was performed to assess the distribution of total leukocytes and the expression of specific lymphocyte subsets using the following antibody panel: anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD16/CD56, anti-CD19, and anti-CD25. Results The immunophenotypic analysis showed that the vast majority of the peripheral blood lymphocytes consisted of T lymphocytes (CD3+), followed by natural killer (NK) cells (CD3-/CD16+/CD56+, NK cells), and B lymphocytes (CD3-/CD19+) in all periods of the study. The peripheral blood CD3+ T-lymphocyte subsets were predominantly T-helper lymphocytes (CD3+/CD4+), followed by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) (CD3+/CD8+, CTLs), and a small percentage were T-regulatory (Treg) cells (CD4+/CD25high, Treghigh cells). Interestingly, lymphocytes showed a slight increase and T-helper lymphocytes a slight decline postoperatively, with no evidence of statistically significant shifts. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the temporal distribution of the peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations. Conclusions To our knowledge, the novelty of our study is that the same patients who underwent breast augmentation with silicone implants were used as the control group. There was no evidence of an early specific systemic immune activation in these patients. Hence, flow cytometry could be a reliable method that can be used as an in vitro test to evaluate the biocompatibility of silicone implants and observe patients with immune activity for possible clinical manifestations of symptoms in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.