ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic fenestration for treating giant middle cranial fossa arachnoid cysts in pediatrics.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis and treatment of arachnoid cyst complicated with subdural hematoma in children.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Article
- Bilateral Subdural Hygromas Following Rupture of a Temporal Arachnoid Cyst in a 16-Year-Old Boy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: A middle cranial fossa is a well-recognized location for an intracranial arachnoid cyst in children. Giant middle fossa arachnoid cysts (GMFACs) can compress brain tissue, leading to rupture and potentially developing a subdural hygroma or hematoma. With recent advancements in neuroendoscopic technology, neuroendoscopic treatments have increasingly been used for middle fossa cysts. However, the risk of subdural effusion or hematoma is higher postoperatively, and the treatment for subdural effusion remains inconclusive. This study aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of this technology by evaluating the clinical and radiological outcomes of endoscopic fenestration for these cysts. Methods: A retrospective review of the operative procedures database identified 26 procedures performed to fenestrate GMFACs at the Neurosurgery Department of Henan Provincial Children's Hospital. The minimum follow-up period exceeded 6 months. Results: A total of 26 patients were included between 2016 and 2021. Among the 26 patients, 19 were male, with a mean age of 3.56 ± 2.98 years; 13 were under 2 years. With the applied technique, the cyst volume reduction rate was 76.9% ( Conclusions: This study analyzed the efficacy of endoscopic treatment in a predominantly treated patient cohort with GMFACs, as indicated by improved clinical symptoms and reduced radiological volume after treatment. Furthermore, This study has shown that age is neither the cause of subdural effusion nor the leading cause of secondary surgery. Most subdural effusions in children can be absorbed within a few months after surgery, and only a few children need subsequent surgical treatment. Endoscopy is a safe technique for managing giant middle fossa cysts, including younger children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.