ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Molecular epidemiology and patient outcome of carbapenem-resistant
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distribution of Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli and Carbapenem Resistance Profiles in Intensive Care Units of a Foundation University Hospital: A 2023-2025 Retrospective Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Genomic analysis of intrahospital transmission of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a multicentre study in Japan.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR), treatment, and outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections in the setting of IMP-type carbapenemase predominance in Japan.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and objectives: Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CRGNB), especially Methods: Between 2019 and 2022, 246 unique patients with carbapenem-resistant Results: A total of 246 isolates were collected from 246 patients, including 78 (31.7%) CRE, 167 (67.9%) CRPA and 1 (0.4%) CRAB. For CRE, 74.4% of the isolates carried carbapenemase genes with predominance of Conclusions: Our study highlights the unique molecular epidemiology and clinical outcomes of CRGNB in Japan.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.