Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40051868›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Effects of simulated litter inputs on ecological niches and interspecific connectivity of alpine meadow plants.

Weishan Lin, Kejia De, Xuemei Xiang, Tingxu Feng, Fei Li, Xijie Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Weishan LinCollege of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Kejia DeCollege of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Xuemei XiangCollege of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Tingxu FengCollege of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Fei LiCollege of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Xijie WeiCollege of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Plant litter enters the soil as the main nutrient for alpine meadow ecosystems, and the amount of litter input has a significant effect on alpine meadow plant diversity, ecological niches, and interspecific connectivity. Methods: The ecological niche width, ecological niche overlap and interspecific associations of alpine meadow species in the Sanjiangyuan area of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau were investigated using ecological statistical methods, and the competitive linkages between species and limited resources within the community and the stable coexistence among populations under different levels of plant litter inputs were explored. Results: (1) Litter inputs could significantly increase the plant diversity and aboveground biomass of alpine meadows, and the species with the highest importance value was Discussion: A moderate amount of litter input (F2) is beneficial to the structural stability of alpine meadow ecosystems. Excessive litter inputs may break the original balance of alpine meadow ecosystems and affect plant growth strategies. This study lays a foundation for the conservation of vegetation diversity and long-term use of grassland resources in degraded alpine meadows on the Tibetan Plateau.

Indexed as

alpine meadowsecological nicheinterspecific connectivitylitterspecies diversity

Identifiers

PMID40051868
PMCPMC11882873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.