ArticleHeliyon2025
Rice straw co-digestion potential with cow dung and poultry droppings for maximizing biogas production in Bangladesh.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Rice straw co-digestion potential with cow dung and poultry droppings for maximizing biogas production in Bangladesh.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Nanotechnology and E-Sensing for Food Chain Quality and Safety.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rice is the staple food of the people of Bangladesh. Burning and landfilling of carbon-rich rice straw (RS) causes greenhouse gas emissions. On the other hand, cow dung (CD) and poultry droppings (PD) produced from the livestock sector in Bangladesh could be a potential threat to the environment if the wastes are not properly managed. However, anaerobic co-digestion of RS with CD and PD could be an effective means of biogas generation. Therefore, co-digestion of CD and PD with carbon-rich RS was conducted in batch assay at seven different mixing ratios (100:0, 90:10, 70:30, 50:50, 30:70, 10:90, 0:100) separately. Mesophilic condition (35 °C) was maintained for 92 days of digestion time to investigate biogas production potential and find out optimal mixing ratios of both co-digestion sets. Co-digestion of CD and RS at 70:30 ratio significantly showed maximum biogas yield (441.7 ± 54.1 ml/gVS). Additionally, an increase in biogas yield in this ratio was 212.11 % and 38.10 % compared to mono-digestion of CD and RS, respectively. Another co-digestion set of PD with RS showed highest biogas yield (344.8 ± 22.3 ml/gVS) at 90:10 ratio. The 90:10 ratio of PD and RS improved biogas yield by 173.16 % and 7.8 % as compared to mono-digestion of PD and RS, respectively. Co-digestion of RS with CD and PD had a statistically significant effect (P ≤ 0.05) on biogas production. Furthermore, kinetic modelling outcomes suggested the modified Gompertz model as ideal for forecasting biomethane production over time in both cases. The findings of this study will help in the implementation of ACoD at the field level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.