Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40051831›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Ensemble stacking of machine learning models for air quality prediction for Hyderabad city in India.

Gokulan Ravindiran, K Karthick, Sivarethinamohan Rajamanickam, Deepshikha Datta, Bimal Das, G Shyamala, Gasim Hayder, Azees Maria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gokulan RavindiranDepartment of Civil Engineering, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560078, India.
K KarthickDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, GMR Institute of Technology, Rajam 532 127, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Sivarethinamohan RajamanickamSymbiosis Centre for Management Studies, Bengaluru Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Deepshikha DattaDepartment of Chemistry, Brainware University, Barasat, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Bimal DasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, Durgapur, West Bengal, India.
G ShyamalaDepartment of Civil Engineering, SR University, Warangal 506371, Telangana, India.
Gasim HayderInstitute of Energy Infrastructure, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), 43000 Kajang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Azees MariaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, VIT-AP University, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh 522 237, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyderabad, one of the rapidly developing cities in India, is facing with severe air pollution due to rapid urbanization, industrial operations, and climatic factors. To alleviate the negative impact on human health and the environment, accurate monitoring and forecasting of air quality are essential. This research utilized various machine learning models, such as XGBoost, LarsCV, Bayesian Ridge, AdaBoost, and ensemble stacking methods, to forecast the air quality index (AQI) using data from August 2016 to October 2023, which included 18 different air pollutants, including meteorological parameters. The ensemble stacking method showed excellent performance, attaining high training (R

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEnvironmental healthEnvironmental monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40051831
PMCPMC11883379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.