ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Exploring predictors of medial collateral ligament tears in lateral approach total knee replacement: A retrospective study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medial collateral ligament (MCL) tears are uncommon in total knee replacement (TKR), but they pose significant surgical challenges, affecting recovery and outcomes. This study analyzed 18 (1.3 %) MCL tear cases from 1429 TKR procedures using a lateral subvastus approach. Logistic regression with Lasso regularization was used to assess factors like gender, BMI, and knee alignment. Midsubstance disruptions were the most common. MCL tears were more frequent in females, those with higher BMI, and valgus alignment. The Lasso model achieved an AUC of 0.83 and an F1 score of 0.76. Methods: A retrospective analysis on 1429 TKR cases performed by three experienced surgeons using the Optimotion Implant system and specialized MCL retractors was conducted. The lateral subvastus approach without parapatellar arthrotomy. A hinged knee brace was applied postoperatively and a posterior stabilized insert was used for MCL tears. Demographic data were collected, and a Lasso regression model with data balancing, was employed to identify MCL tear predictors. Results: Among the 1429 TKR cases, 18 cases (1.3 %) involved MCL tears. The average age of these patients was 67.3 years (not statistically significant). The average BMI for patients with MCL tears was 36.7, significantly higher than the overall group average of 31.5, suggesting a link between higher BMI and MCL tears. Females were notably more affected, making up 88.9 % of the MCL tear cases compared to 11.1 % of males. Regarding knee alignment, 38.9 % had valgus alignment (p < 0.05), No significant differences were observed in knee flexion or Knee Society Scores (KSS) following MCL tears. Conclusions: Gender, BMI, and knee alignment are significant factors influencing the incidence of MCL tears in TKR procedures. The Lasso model effectively identified individuals at higher risk. Preventive measures, including surgeon training and the use of specialized MCL retractors, were implemented. Functional outcomes such as knee flexion and KSS scores did not show significant differences post-MCL tear.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.