ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Complications after cosmetic limb lengthening, a specialized center experience.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cosmetic limb lengthening has been rapidly growing ever since the advent of the external fixators magnetic lengthening nails. Similar to all surgical procedures, cosmetic limb lengthening is not risk free. This paper presents a series of complications encountered and treated at a specialized limb lengthening and deformity correction center, along with an analysis of potential risk factors. Methods: A series of referred patients for complications after limb lengthening using IM nails were identified. Collected variables included demographics, place of index surgery, complication, and treatment of choice and outcome of treatment. Results: 22 limb lengthening procedures were identified. Most of these cases were done outside of the U.S. Hardware failure occurred in 23 % of index surgeries, primarily affecting femurs. Mal/nonunion rates were high (45 %), with femurs most affected. Iatrogenic deformities, primarily tibial, and soft tissue complications including contractures and nerve entrapment were observed. Treatment strategies included hardware exchange, bone grafting, and soft tissue release. All patients were successfully treated without any patients suffering from serious long term irreversible outcomes. Conclusion: This study examines the surgical management of complications arising from cosmetic limb lengthening procedures at a single institution. We provide insights into effective treatment strategies and highlight the risks associated with medical tourism for these procedures. Our findings demonstrate a rising incidence of complications linked to international limb lengthening centers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.