ArticleNeuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press)2025
Erythropoietin for the Treatment of Methanol Toxic Optic Neuropathy: Does It Really Work? A Case Series.
Article in Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Approaches for Toxic Optic Neuropathies: Insights from Methanol-Induced Optic Neuropathy and NAION Treatments.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erythropoietin (EPO) has demonstrated neuroprotective properties and has been used in small case series to treat methanol optic neuropathy. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of EPO. This retrospective case series included data from patients diagnosed with methanol optic neuropathy between November 2022 and December 2023 from two centers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Demographic information, time of consumption of methanol to EPO treatment, and other treatments administered were collected. Vision assessment was performed before and after EPO treatment. A total of 8 male patients were included, with an average age of 38.25 ± 7.15 years. The median duration of the follow-up was 66 days, ranging from 13 to 660 days. The means of vision in the logMAR of both eyes before EPO treatment was 1.98 ± 1.08, which changed to 1.87 ± 0.89 after EPO treatment. Patient's presenting vision before EPO treatment is a significant positive predictor for the vision after treatment with coefficient = 0.782 and 95% CI = 0.349, 0.936. Time to EPO treatment was not statistically significant in defining end vision. Treating methanol optic neuropathy is challenging and time sensitive. In this case series, EPO and adjuvant steroids showed variable effects on visual improvement. Although the vision improved after the treatment, these differences were not statistically significant. Repeat EPO did not give better outcomes. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the overall impact of EPO treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.