ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Advocating for Our Children: An Initiative Utilizing Verbal and Video Education to Increase Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire Form Response Rate.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Negative experiences in childhood, Adverse Childhood Experiences, significantly increase the risk of adverse health outcomes in adulthood. Obtaining a better understanding of the experiences a child has been through during development allows providers to connect them with resources to improve health outcomes. Methods: We performed problem identification via PubMed and the Florida Department of Health web page. We used the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) quality improvement method. Intervention one involved teaching clinic staff about distributing the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (ACE-Q) form during well-check visits. Intervention two involved a video education tool to explain the purpose and importance of the ACE-Q to caretakers. We conducted a retrospective chart review at the 17 Davis and HealthPark clinics 3 months preceding each PDSA cycle. We analyzed the data to assess the response rate to the ACE-Q before and after each cycle. Results: The educational initiatives increased the response rate to the ACE-Q form in both PDSA cycles. The ACE-Q was significantly more likely to be filled out after the first (19.2% in pre versus 24.8% in post, Conclusions: Verbal and video education models can increase the response rate to the ACE-Q. Response collection is valuable for identifying and supporting patients at the highest risk for poor health outcomes. Future studies would benefit from addressing low view counts on video interventions, standardizing ACE-Q score assessment, and implementing sustainable measures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.